ENVIRONMENTAL UPDATES
Page developed and maintained by Alan
Journet
Current issues gleaned from various sources
| Page Last Updated | 06/17/01 07:05 PM |
| Drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge | |
| Global Warming | |
| CAFOs Under Fire | |
| Hard Rock Mining | |
| A Bush March Towards Destruction | |
ARCTIC
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
Ninety-five percent of
Alaska's vast North Slope is open to oil and gas exploration and leasing. The
coastal plain of the arctic National Wildlife Refuge represents the last five
percent that remains off-limits to development. According to the U.S.
Geological Survey, the mean estimate of oil that could be recovered from the
Refuge would amount to less than a six-month supply for America.
In addition, it would take at least 10 years to do the exploration,
construction, and drilling necessary to get it to U.S. markets.
A recent Associated Press
poll of one thousand adults found that 53 percent of US voters oppose drilling
in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, while only 33 percent support such a
move.
Raising average fuel use by cars and light trucks to 35 miles
per gallon by 2010 would result in oil savings of 1.5 million barrels a day by that time,
a report by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy says. The United States Geological Survey estimates that the Alaskan refuge would probably produce 580,000 barrels a day later this decade.
Calling global warming
"a real phenomenon," U.S. Environmental Protection
--Dow
Jones Newswires -- February 27, 2001
BUT THEN - GEORGE W. BUSH DROPPED THE BALL
From
Sierra Club Action Alert:
Yesterday
President Bush did an abrupt U turn on controlling carbon dioxide from power
plants, breaking one of the few pro-environment campaign commitments he
made. In his budget he also
broke the promise on increasing funding for the National Parks, now robbing
other valuable under-funded Park programs to provide funding for Park
maintenance. It's time for
environmentalists nationwide to expose these early anti-environmental
actions and hold him accountable early in his Presidency.
The American people need to learn about these anti-environmental
positions through letters to the editor in your local papers.
Please take the time to send in a letter on this topic this week so
we can hold the President accountable and warn him that any future attacks
on the environment will be noticed.
Here are the details:
President George W. Bush has broken the campaign promise he made to
the American people to curb carbon dioxide pollution, the primary gas
causing global warming. This promise to reduce carbon emissions was one of
the few environmental pledges Bush made during his campaign. His about-face
is a betrayal and proof that Bush is a typical politician who can't be
trusted.
The President reneged on his campaign promise to curb carbon dioxide
pollution under pressure from the coal companies and power plant owners
Polluters pumped massive campaign
contributions into the Bush-Cheney campaign and Bush's u-turn on emissions
is evidence that Bush owes and will side with the industries that funded his
campaign.
In a Sept. 29, 2000 campaign speech in Saginaw, Michigan, Bush pledged
to curb carbon dioxide pollution:
"As we promote electricity and renewable energy, we will work to
make our air cleaner. With the help of Congress, environmental groups and
industry, we will require all power plants to meet clean air standards in
order to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and
carbon dioxide within a reasonable period of time."
Yet, on March 13, 2001 Bush wrote "I do not believe...that the
government should impose on power plants mandatory emissions for carbon
dioxide."
Carbon dioxide accounts for about 70% of the global warming problem.
The U.S. is the world's biggest global warming polluter, spewing 25%
of the planet's global warming pollution; one-third of our emissions come
from power plants. So the
President's refusal to impose mandatory carbon dioxide cuts will have severe
consequences on our nation and the world.
Already the 1990's were the warmest decade on record; record heat
waves killed hundreds in the Midwest. Further
global warming will trigger:
- More
severe and frequent killer heat waves in our cities,
- Sea level
rise, inundating coastal areas,
- Spreading infectious diseases as disease-carrying insects and rodents
bring diseases to new areas,
- More severe storms as rainfall patterns change and warming leads to
more energy in the atmosphere, and
- More
severe droughts as increased heat leads to more rapid evaporation.
Some regions of the world have already warmed by as much as 5 degrees
Fahrenheit. Physicians at
Harvard University and Johns Hopkins medical schools have issued grim
assessments that global warming may already be causing the spread of
infectious diseases and increasing heat-wave deaths.
At the same time, during the
campaign George W. Bush committed to increase funding for the National Park
Service to deal with the backlog of maintenance from old neglected
infrastructure. He highlighted
this issue in his first address to Congress and got a round of applause.
Now it is apparent that he is robbing Peter to pay Paul,
shortchanging other under-funded Park programs such as research and ranger
interpretation programs to steer money to the maintenance budget line item.
He is also using the need to fund the existing Park's as an excuse to
attack the new National Monuments, claiming that President Clinton's actions
to establish new parks has caused the problem.
Two environmental campaign
promises, two broken promises. This
is a reckless start for the Bush Presidency.
Please let the American people
know you care about this through a letter to the editor today.
From
World Wildlife Fund Action Report.
Despite new scientific findings
that global warming is already having a serious impact on species and their
habitats, President Bush recently reversed a campaign pledge and decided not
to seek reductions in the carbon dioxide emissions of the nation's power
plants. He has also said he
will not support the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement that calls
on industrialized countries to reduce their carbon pollution in order to
curb global warming. His
decision means the spectacled bear of the Andes, the mountain gorilla in
Africa, the resplendent quetzal of Central America, and many other species
of mammals, invertebrates, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and insects will
remain at risk from our overheated atmosphere.
More than 100 governments
represented on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Let's show President Bush there is tremendous support for protecting our
living planet. Please follow the simple steps below to send a free message
urging him to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and support the climate change
protocol.
(1) An increasing body of
observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and other changes
in the climate system.
* Since 1860, global average
temperatures have increased by 0.6 +/- 0.2 degrees Celsius (>1 degree
Fahrenheit). While the warming record shows significant spatial and temporal
variability, the global upward trend is unambiguous. Most of the warming in
the 20th century occurred from about 1910 to 1945 and since 1976.
* Twentieth century warming is
likely to be the largest during any century during the past 1,000 years for
the Northern hemisphere, with the 1990s the warmest decade and 1998 the
warmest year.
* There has been a widespread
retreat of mountain glaciers in non-polar regions during the 20th century.
* The rate of sea-level rise
during the 20th century was about 10 times higher than the average rate
during the last 3,000 years. Global ocean heat content has also increased
since the late 1950s.
* Other climate variables have
also markedly changed, including an increase in average precipitation (up to
1% per decade in the 20th century over the northern mid- and high
latitudes), a likely increase in extreme precipitation events over the same
region, and more frequent, persistent and intense warm phases of the ENSO
phenomenon.
(2) Emissions of greenhouse gases
and aerosols due to human activities continue to alter the atmosphere in
ways that are expected to affect the climate.
* Since 1750, atmospheric
concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) have increased significantly.
Percentage increases since 1750 are given below for the most important GHGs:
CO2 - 31%
CH4 - 250%
N2O - 16%
* Atmospheric concentrations of
halocarbons, gases of solely anthropogenic source, are either decreasing or
increasing more slowly in recent years. However, concentrations of
* Present concentrations of CO2
are the highest in the past 420,000 years and likely in the past 20 million
years, and the rate of increase is unprecedented in the past 20,000 years.
* The increase is largely due to
fossil fuel burning (about 75%), the remainder primarily from deforestation
and other land use changes.
* The greatest warming effect
currently stems from CO2, followed by methane, halocarbons, and nitrous
oxide.
* Cooling effects stem from the
depletion of stratospheric ozone and generally from relatively short-lived
aerosols. Indirect radiative forcing of aerosols through their effects
(3) There is new and stronger
evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is
attributable to human activities.
* Since the Second Assessment
Report (SAR) in 1995, which stated "the balance of evidence suggests a
discernable human influence on global climate," significant progress
has been made to reduce the uncertainty around human contribution to global
warming.
* The TAR concludes, "there
is now stronger evidence for human influence on global climate than at the
time of the SAR" due in part to: longer data records, improved
scientific understanding of natural climate variability, new estimates of
climate response to natural and human forcings, new detection techniques,
and more studies.
* The net radiative forcing of
natural agents (variable output from the sun, amplification of solar
effects, and aerosol emissions during volcanic eruptions) is small compared
to anthropogenic forcings, and - over the past two, and possibly four,
decades - negative (i.e., their net effect is a cooling effect).
(4) Trends of greenhouse gas
emissions from human activities point further upward. Significant emission
reductions would be necessary to stabilize radiative forcing.
* CO2emissions from fossil-fuel
burning are "virtually certain" to be the dominant influence on
the trends in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the 21st century.
* Although land and oceans
currently are sinks for atmospheric CO2, their ability to take up CO2
will
decrease during the 21st century.
* CO2 concentrations in 2100
could be between 540 and 970 parts per million (ppm), compared to 270 ppm in
pre-industrial times and 367 ppm today.
* If further destabilization of
the global climate system is to be prevented, significant reductions in GHG
emissions and related gases that control their atmospheric concentration are
necessary.
(5) Confidence in the ability of
models to project future climate has increased.
* Understanding of climate
processes and their representation in models has improved, including on
issues such as water vapor, sea ice dynamics, and ocean heat transport.
* Some recent models produce
reasonable climate simulations without non-physical adjustments, such as for
heat and water fluxes.
* Several models can reproduce
the observed warming trend in the 20th century when forced with both natural
and anthropogenic forcing.
* Together with other
improvement, the IPCC thus concludes that despite remaining uncertainties,
there is now greater confidence in model projections than before.
(6) Global warming will persist
for many centuries.
* Without significant reductions
in GHG emissions, the Earth's surface temperature is predicted to rise 2.5°
to 10.4° F between 1990 and 2100; the upper end of this range is of similar
magnitude to the warming the earth experienced emerging from the depth of
the last ice age 20,000 years ago to the warmth of the present interglacial
beginning about
* Global warming will mean higher maximum temperatures and more extreme heat
events, higher average precipitation with more extreme precipitation events
and more droughts in some areas, as well as a possible increase in tropical
cyclone intensities.
* Most climate models show a
weakening of the ocean thermohaline circulation, which would lead to reduced
heat transfer to northern hemispheric high-latitudes and would have major
implications for ocean dynamics, marine ecology, and climate variability in
Europe.
* Emissions of long-lived GHGs
have protracted effects on atmospheric composition and the physical dynamics
of the climate system.
* Global mean surface temperature
will continue to increase, and sea levels are projected to continue to rise
for hundreds of years after GHG concentrations have been stabilized; the
projected sea-level rise between 1990 and 2100 is 3.54 to 34.64 inches.
** REMAINING GAPS IN OUR
UNDERSTANDING
Very significant progress has
been made over the past decade and more in our understanding of the climate
system and its many interactions with the oceans, land, biosphere, and
cryosphere (ice). In fact, IPCC assessment reports can be viewed as the
milestones of one of the biggest communal efforts ever undertaken by the
international scientific community to understand this essential component of
the Earth system. The Working Group I report is testimony to our improved
understanding of climate change science. By laying out the new research
agenda, it also stakes out the current research frontier. Among the many
areas needing further monitoring and research are:
* Estimates of future emissions;
* Patterns of long-term climate
variability;
* Understanding and description
of dominant processes such as ocean mixing, and feedback mechanisms (e.g.,
from sea ice and clouds) between the atmosphere, biosphere, cryosphere, and
the deep oceans;
* Integration (nesting) of global
and smaller-scale climate models to improve predictions of climate change
and extreme events at the regional scale.
* Linkage of climate and
human-system models
To make progress in these areas,
IPCC experts call for the maintenance of existing climate observational
networks and platforms, as well as the improved collaboration within and
across the international scientific community.
* The Third Assessment Report (TAR) is THE authoritative new
benchmark of what we know about climate change science. It synthesizes what
the global scientific community has learned in the past five years about our
changing climate and its impacts on people and the environment.
* The TAR is the most
comprehensive and balanced assessment of the science of climate change, the
factors involved in change, the already evident and potential future impacts
of global warming, and what we can do about them.
* The conclusions of the TAR
represent an unprecedented consensus among hundreds of climate scientists
from all over the world. The entire Third Assessment Report (including the
three Working Group reports, SPMs, and final synthesis) is co-authored by
more than 400 scientists and reviewed several times by approximately 1,000
experts.
* The IPCC does not produce
original scientific results but rather presents a fair representation of the
range of scientific opinion on climate change, based primarily on published
and peer-reviewed scientific literature.
The IPCC predicts that global temperature will rise from 2.5-10.4°F
(1.4-5.8°C) over this century unless greenhouse gas emissions are greatly
reduced.
* The TAR concludes that there is
increasing evidence of a human influence on climate. The report says that
greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are likely to already
"have contributed substantially to the observed warming over
{You won’t see this in
the Southeast Missourian (SMLRWO)}
Confined Animal Feedlot
Operations (CAFOs) run by huge corporate pork producers have long been under
attack from the small family farms that they put out of business, and
neighborhood residents who object to the stench and pollution that they
regularly visit upon the areas in which they function.
Posted: Thursday, March 1,
2001, 5:34 a.m.
Environmental, farmer groups sue biggest pork producer
By Bill Bell Jr.
St. Louis Post-Dispatch Jefferson City Bureau
A coalition of
environmental and farmers' groups led by Robert Kennedy Jr. filed three clean
air and clean water lawsuits Wednesday against the world's largest pork
producer.
The federal and state
lawsuits were filed in North Carolina. Another suit will be filed today in
Tampa, Fla., accusing Smithfield Foods of violating federal racketeering laws,
Kennedy said.
Wednesday's announcement
came at a hotel near the Kansas City International Airport. Joining Kennedy
were representatives of the Sierra Club and other corporate hog farm foes from
Mississippi, North Carolina, Illinois, Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri.
With the suits, Kennedy
said he hopes to shut down the waste disposal system that most corporate hog
farms use. The farms typically flush out football field-sized barns and
collect the waste in lagoons. The manure is sprayed over neighboring fields.
Smithfield, Kennedy said,
knows the system breaks federal laws, but it continues the practice because it
helps it make money. "Smithfield is aware that it is illegal,"
Kennedy said in a phone interview with the Post-Dispatch. "We have to
establish the fact that they are, in fact, a criminal enterprise."
In a written statement,
Richard J. M. Poulson, vice president and senior adviser to the chairman for
Smithfield, called the lawsuits, a "gross perversion of our legal
system." Smithfield is based in southern Virginia.
"Today's announcement
represents a dangerous new direction in the trial lawyers' campaign of
extortion-by-litigation," Poulson wrote. He noted that Smithfield uses
"state-of-the-art waste disposal technologies."
Ken Midkiff, the Sierra
Club's national clean water coordinator said the event was held in Missouri to
send "a message to the pork production companies in the Midwest that they
could be next."
The suits could have a
direct impact on the company's operations near Nevada, Mo., about 75 miles
south of Kansas City. But Missouri also is home to Premium Standard Farms, the
nation's second-largest pork producer.
"I think Premium
Standard is going to be looking at the results in this case," Kennedy
said. "PSF and the whole industry is now on notice that we think their
activities to be criminal activities."
A spokesman for Premium
Standard did not return phone messages Wednesday.
Kennedy has worked on
cleaning up the Hudson River and serves as legal counsel for several
environmental groups.
The attorneys bringing the
suits with Kennedy are some of the top class-action lawyers in the nation,
said lawyer Charlie Speer of Overland Park, Kan., who also is involved in the
case. These lawyers have worked on "the tobacco class-action wars,"
asbestos cases and the Exxon Valdez, Speer said.
"These guys got jets," he said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other sources carrying this story
Only successful links remain available.
New
York Times
Washington
Post
Los
Angeles Times
New
Bern (NC) Sun Journal
Denver
Post
Virginia
Pilot
HARD
ROCK MINING AND BLM LAND
On March 23rd the Bush Administration asked for public comments on a proposal
to roll back new BLM hard rock mining regulations that would have been more
protective of the environment and the public's health. These new regulations
are the product of a four year rulemaking process – a process which involved
thousands of public comments, dozens of public hearings in cities across the
west, and four different drafts of the rule – and replaced old regulations
that failed to protect our public lands from toxic mining pollution. The Bush
administration, led by Interior Secretary Gale Norton, now proposes a return
to the earlier rules. The new regulations are urgently needed to protect our
land, air and water from pollution for at least three reasons:
FROM
'The Planet' May 2001 http://www.sierraclub.org/planet/
MARCH - A Month of Madness
President Bush has revealed his willingness to risk American's health and wild places for the sake of appeasing industry. Consider these actions he took in March:
March 13: Bush's abrupt flip-flop on reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants broke a campaign promise, undercut Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Whitman, damaged relations with European allies and seriously impaired progress on global warming.
March 15: Bush pushed for more oil drilling in recently designated national monuments, ignoring vast potential for energy conservation and development of clean energy sources.
March 16: Bush announced his decision to suspend rules on roadless areas in national forests, possibly signaling his intention to reverse the regulations entirely.
March 20: Bush announced his decision not to tighten standards on arsenic in drinking water, thereby exposing 12.7 million Americans to additional risks for cancer and other diseases. The EPA said further public comment is needed, despite the past 25 years of study, public comment and missed statutory deadlines.
March 21: President Bush's Interior Department announced its intention to reverse requirements that mining operations post a bond equal to estimated cleanup costs. That means more mining companies will be allowed to go bankrupt, leaving taxpayers to clean up their messes.
March 27: Bush's EPA stated it opposes the 1997 Kyoto global-warming treaty, under which the United States would have to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other pollutants by 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. In a letter to four conservative senators, Bush said the agreement would harm the U.S. economy.