TRAIL OZARK CHAPTER
of
TEARS 
SIERRA CLUB GROUP

 
ENVIRONMENTAL UPDATES
Page developed and maintained by Alan Journet
Current issues gleaned from various sources

Page Last Updated 06/17/01 07:05 PM
Drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Global Warming
CAFOs Under Fire
Hard Rock Mining
A Bush March Towards Destruction

ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Ninety-five percent of Alaska's vast North Slope is open to oil and gas exploration and leasing. The coastal plain of the arctic National Wildlife Refuge represents the last five percent that remains off-limits to development. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the mean estimate of oil that could be recovered from the Refuge would amount to less than a six-month supply for America.  In addition, it would take at least 10 years to do the exploration, construction, and drilling necessary to get it to U.S. markets.

A recent Associated Press poll of one thousand adults found that 53 percent of US voters oppose drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, while only 33 percent support such a move.  

Raising average fuel use by cars and light trucks to 35 miles per gallon by 2010 would result in oil savings of 1.5 million barrels a day by that time, a report by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy says. The United States Geological Survey estimates that the Alaskan refuge would probably produce 580,000 barrels a day later this decade.

GLOBAL WARMING

Calling global warming "a real phenomenon," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency chief Christie Whitman said Tuesday the administration is considering limits on carbon dioxide emissions as part of a broader anti-pollution strategy.

--Dow Jones Newswires -- February 27, 2001

BUT THEN - GEORGE W. BUSH DROPPED THE BALL

From Sierra Club Action Alert:

Yesterday President Bush did an abrupt U turn on controlling carbon dioxide from power plants, breaking one of the few pro-environment campaign commitments he made.  In his budget he also broke the promise on increasing funding for the National Parks, now robbing other valuable under-funded Park programs to provide funding for Park maintenance.  It's time for environmentalists nationwide to expose these early anti-environmental actions and hold him accountable early in his Presidency.

 The American people need to learn about these anti-environmental positions through letters to the editor in your local papers.  Please take the time to send in a letter on this topic this week so we can hold the President accountable and warn him that any future attacks on the environment will be noticed.

 Here are the details:

        President George W. Bush has broken the campaign promise he made to the American people to curb carbon dioxide pollution, the primary gas causing global warming. This promise to reduce carbon emissions was one of the few environmental pledges Bush made during his campaign. His about-face is a betrayal and proof that Bush is a typical politician who can't be trusted.

        The President reneged on his campaign promise to curb carbon dioxide pollution under pressure from the coal companies and power plant owners 

        Polluters pumped massive campaign contributions into the Bush-Cheney campaign and Bush's u-turn on emissions is evidence that Bush owes and will side with the industries that funded his campaign.

        In a Sept. 29, 2000 campaign speech in Saginaw, Michigan, Bush pledged to curb carbon dioxide pollution:

        "As we promote electricity and renewable energy, we will work to make our air cleaner. With the help of Congress, environmental groups and industry, we will require all power plants to meet clean air standards in order to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon dioxide within a reasonable period of time."

        Yet, on March 13, 2001 Bush wrote "I do not believe...that the government should impose on power plants mandatory emissions for carbon dioxide."

        Carbon dioxide accounts for about 70% of the global warming problem.  The U.S. is the world's biggest global warming polluter, spewing 25% of the planet's global warming pollution; one-third of our emissions come from power plants.  So the President's refusal to impose mandatory carbon dioxide cuts will have severe consequences on our nation and the world.

        Already the 1990's were the warmest decade on record; record heat waves killed hundreds in the Midwest.  Further global warming will trigger:

-       More severe and frequent killer heat waves in our cities,

-       Sea level rise, inundating coastal areas,

-       Spreading infectious diseases as disease-carrying insects and rodents bring diseases to new areas,

-       More severe storms as rainfall patterns change and warming leads to more energy in the atmosphere, and

-       More severe droughts as increased heat leads to more rapid evaporation.

        Some regions of the world have already warmed by as much as 5 degrees Fahrenheit.  Physicians at Harvard University and Johns Hopkins medical schools have issued grim assessments that global warming may already be causing the spread of infectious diseases and increasing heat-wave deaths.

        At the same time, during the campaign George W. Bush committed to increase funding for the National Park Service to deal with the backlog of maintenance from old neglected infrastructure.  He highlighted this issue in his first address to Congress and got a round of applause.  Now it is apparent that he is robbing Peter to pay Paul, shortchanging other under-funded Park programs such as research and ranger interpretation programs to steer money to the maintenance budget line item.  He is also using the need to fund the existing Park's as an excuse to attack the new National Monuments, claiming that President Clinton's actions to establish new parks has caused the problem.

        Two environmental campaign promises, two broken promises.  This is a reckless start for the Bush Presidency.

        Please let the American people know you care about this through a letter to the editor today.

From World Wildlife Fund Action Report.

        Despite new scientific findings that global warming is already having a serious impact on species and their habitats, President Bush recently reversed a campaign pledge and decided not to seek reductions in the carbon dioxide emissions of the nation's power plants.  He has also said he will not support the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement that calls on industrialized countries to reduce their carbon pollution in order to curb global warming.  His decision means the spectacled bear of the Andes, the mountain gorilla in Africa, the resplendent quetzal of Central America, and many other species of mammals, invertebrates, reptiles, birds, amphibians, and insects will remain at risk from our overheated atmosphere. 

        More than 100 governments represented on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently endorsed a report that states that climate change is already having a "widespread and coherent impact" on the planet, and that it is occurring in all environments and on all continents.  President Bush's decision not to seek emissions reductions flies in the face of dire warnings about the irreparable damage global warming is causing and is at odds with the position of his administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  His change of heart came after heavy lobbying from the oil and coal industries and congressional Republicans. 

        Let's show President Bush there is tremendous support for protecting our living planet. Please follow the simple steps below to send a free message urging him to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and support the climate change protocol.

From Union of Concerned Scientists:

(1) An increasing body of observations gives a collective picture of a warming world and other changes in the climate system.

* Since 1860, global average temperatures have increased by 0.6 +/- 0.2 degrees Celsius (>1 degree Fahrenheit). While the warming record shows significant spatial and temporal variability, the global upward trend is unambiguous. Most of the warming in the 20th century occurred from about 1910 to 1945 and since 1976.

* Twentieth century warming is likely to be the largest during any century during the past 1,000 years for the Northern hemisphere, with the 1990s the warmest decade and 1998 the warmest year.

* There has been a widespread retreat of mountain glaciers in non-polar regions during the 20th century.

* The rate of sea-level rise during the 20th century was about 10 times higher than the average rate during the last 3,000 years. Global ocean heat content has also increased since the late 1950s.

* Other climate variables have also markedly changed, including an increase in average precipitation (up to 1% per decade in the 20th century over the northern mid- and high latitudes), a likely increase in extreme precipitation events over the same region, and more frequent, persistent and intense warm phases of the ENSO phenomenon.

(2) Emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols due to human activities continue to alter the atmosphere in ways that are expected to affect the climate.

* Since 1750, atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) have increased significantly. Percentage increases since 1750 are given below for the most important GHGs:

    CO2 - 31%

    CH4 - 250%

    N2O - 16%

* Atmospheric concentrations of halocarbons, gases of solely anthropogenic source, are either decreasing or increasing more slowly in recent years. However, concentrations of their substitutes are increasing rapidly

* Present concentrations of CO2 are the highest in the past 420,000 years and likely in the past 20 million years, and the rate of increase is unprecedented in the past 20,000 years.

* The increase is largely due to fossil fuel burning (about 75%), the remainder primarily from deforestation and other land use changes.

* The greatest warming effect currently stems from CO2, followed by methane, halocarbons, and nitrous oxide.

* Cooling effects stem from the depletion of stratospheric ozone and generally from relatively short-lived aerosols. Indirect radiative forcing of aerosols through their effects on the structure of clouds remains uncertain

(3) There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.

* Since the Second Assessment Report (SAR) in 1995, which stated "the balance of evidence suggests a discernable human influence on global climate," significant progress has been made to reduce the uncertainty around human contribution to global warming.

* The TAR concludes, "there is now stronger evidence for human influence on global climate than at the time of the SAR" due in part to: longer data records, improved scientific understanding of natural climate variability, new estimates of climate response to natural and human forcings, new detection techniques, and more studies.

* The net radiative forcing of natural agents (variable output from the sun, amplification of solar effects, and aerosol emissions during volcanic eruptions) is small compared to anthropogenic forcings, and - over the past two, and possibly four, decades - negative (i.e., their net effect is a cooling effect).

(4) Trends of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities point further upward. Significant emission reductions would be necessary to stabilize radiative forcing.

* CO2emissions from fossil-fuel burning are "virtually certain" to be the dominant influence on the trends in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the 21st century.

* Although land and oceans currently are sinks for atmospheric CO2, their ability to take up CO2 will decrease during the 21st century.

* CO2 concentrations in 2100 could be between 540 and 970 parts per million (ppm), compared to 270 ppm in pre-industrial times and 367 ppm today.

* If further destabilization of the global climate system is to be prevented, significant reductions in GHG emissions and related gases that control their atmospheric concentration are necessary.

(5) Confidence in the ability of models to project future climate has increased.

* Understanding of climate processes and their representation in models has improved, including on issues such as water vapor, sea ice dynamics, and ocean heat transport.

* Some recent models produce reasonable climate simulations without non-physical adjustments, such as for heat and water fluxes.

* Several models can reproduce the observed warming trend in the 20th century when forced with both natural and anthropogenic forcing.

* Together with other improvement, the IPCC thus concludes that despite remaining uncertainties, there is now greater confidence in model projections than before.

(6) Global warming will persist for many centuries.

* Without significant reductions in GHG emissions, the Earth's surface temperature is predicted to rise 2.5° to 10.4° F between 1990 and 2100; the upper end of this range is of similar magnitude to the warming the earth experienced emerging from the depth of the last ice age 20,000 years ago to the warmth of the present interglacial beginning about 10,000 years ago.

* Global warming will mean higher maximum temperatures and more extreme heat events, higher average precipitation with more extreme precipitation events and more droughts in some areas, as well as a possible increase in tropical cyclone intensities.

* Most climate models show a weakening of the ocean thermohaline circulation, which would lead to reduced heat transfer to northern hemispheric high-latitudes and would have major implications for ocean dynamics, marine ecology, and climate variability in Europe.

* Emissions of long-lived GHGs have protracted effects on atmospheric composition and the physical dynamics of the climate system.

* Global mean surface temperature will continue to increase, and sea levels are projected to continue to rise for hundreds of years after GHG concentrations have been stabilized; the projected sea-level rise between 1990 and 2100 is 3.54 to 34.64 inches.

** REMAINING GAPS IN OUR UNDERSTANDING

Very significant progress has been made over the past decade and more in our understanding of the climate system and its many interactions with the oceans, land, biosphere, and cryosphere (ice). In fact, IPCC assessment reports can be viewed as the milestones of one of the biggest communal efforts ever undertaken by the international scientific community to understand this essential component of the Earth system. The Working Group I report is testimony to our improved understanding of climate change science. By laying out the new research agenda, it also stakes out the current research frontier. Among the many areas needing further monitoring and research are:

* Estimates of future emissions;

* Patterns of long-term climate variability;

* Understanding and description of dominant processes such as ocean mixing, and feedback mechanisms (e.g., from sea ice and clouds) between the atmosphere, biosphere, cryosphere, and the deep oceans;

* Integration (nesting) of global and smaller-scale climate models to improve predictions of climate change and extreme events at the regional scale.

* Linkage of climate and human-system models

To make progress in these areas, IPCC experts call for the maintenance of existing climate observational networks and platforms, as well as the improved collaboration within and across the international scientific community.

*  The Third Assessment Report (TAR) is THE authoritative new benchmark of what we know about climate change science. It synthesizes what the global scientific community has learned in the past five years about our changing climate and its impacts on people and the environment.

* The TAR is the most comprehensive and balanced assessment of the science of climate change, the factors involved in change, the already evident and potential future impacts of global warming, and what we can do about them.

* The conclusions of the TAR represent an unprecedented consensus among hundreds of climate scientists from all over the world. The entire Third Assessment Report (including the three Working Group reports, SPMs, and final synthesis) is co-authored by more than 400 scientists and reviewed several times by approximately 1,000 experts.

* The IPCC does not produce original scientific results but rather presents a fair representation of the range of scientific opinion on climate change, based primarily on published and peer-reviewed scientific literature.

 The IPCC predicts that global temperature will rise from 2.5-10.4°F (1.4-5.8°C) over this century unless greenhouse gas emissions are greatly reduced.

* The TAR concludes that there is increasing evidence of a human influence on climate. The report says that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are likely to already "have contributed substantially to the observed warming over the last 50 years." The IPCC states that this human influence will continue to grow during the next century unless measures are taken to reduce GHG emissions.

   CAFOs UNDER FIRE.

{You won’t see this in the Southeast Missourian (SMLRWO)}

Confined Animal Feedlot Operations (CAFOs) run by huge corporate pork producers have long been under attack from the small family farms that they put out of business, and neighborhood residents who object to the stench and pollution that they regularly visit upon the areas in which they function.

Posted: Thursday, March 1, 2001,  5:34 a.m.
Environmental, farmer groups sue biggest pork producer
By Bill Bell Jr.
St. Louis Post-Dispatch Jefferson City Bureau

A coalition of environmental and farmers' groups led by Robert Kennedy Jr. filed three clean air and clean water lawsuits Wednesday against the world's largest pork producer.

The federal and state lawsuits were filed in North Carolina. Another suit will be filed today in Tampa, Fla., accusing Smithfield Foods of violating federal racketeering laws, Kennedy said.

Wednesday's announcement came at a hotel near the Kansas City International Airport. Joining Kennedy were representatives of the Sierra Club and other corporate hog farm foes from Mississippi, North Carolina, Illinois, Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri.

With the suits, Kennedy said he hopes to shut down the waste disposal system that most corporate hog farms use. The farms typically flush out football field-sized barns and collect the waste in lagoons. The manure is sprayed over neighboring fields.

Smithfield, Kennedy said, knows the system breaks federal laws, but it continues the practice because it helps it make money. "Smithfield is aware that it is illegal," Kennedy said in a phone interview with the Post-Dispatch. "We have to establish the fact that they are, in fact, a criminal enterprise."

In a written statement, Richard J. M. Poulson, vice president and senior adviser to the chairman for Smithfield, called the lawsuits, a "gross perversion of our legal system." Smithfield is based in southern Virginia.

"Today's announcement represents a dangerous new direction in the trial lawyers' campaign of extortion-by-litigation," Poulson wrote. He noted that Smithfield uses "state-of-the-art waste disposal technologies."

Ken Midkiff, the Sierra Club's national clean water coordinator said the event was held in Missouri to send "a message to the pork production companies in the Midwest that they could be next."

The suits could have a direct impact on the company's operations near Nevada, Mo., about 75 miles south of Kansas City. But Missouri also is home to Premium Standard Farms, the nation's second-largest pork producer.

"I think Premium Standard is going to be looking at the results in this case," Kennedy said. "PSF and the whole industry is now on notice that we think their activities to be criminal activities."

A spokesman for Premium Standard did not return phone messages Wednesday.

Kennedy has worked on cleaning up the Hudson River and serves as legal counsel for several environmental groups.

The attorneys bringing the suits with Kennedy are some of the top class-action lawyers in the nation, said lawyer Charlie Speer of Overland Park, Kan., who also is involved in the case. These lawyers have worked on "the tobacco class-action wars," asbestos cases and the Exxon Valdez, Speer said.

"These guys got jets," he said.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other sources carrying this story
Only successful links remain available. 

New York Times
Washington Post
Los Angeles Times
New Bern (NC) Sun Journal
Denver Post
Virginia Pilot

HARD ROCK MINING AND BLM LAND
On March 23rd the Bush Administration asked for public comments on a proposal to roll back new BLM hard rock mining regulations that would have been more protective of the environment and the public's health. These new regulations are the product of a four year rulemaking process – a process which involved thousands of public comments, dozens of public hearings in cities across the west, and four different drafts of the rule – and replaced old regulations that failed to protect our public lands from toxic mining pollution. The Bush administration, led by Interior Secretary Gale Norton, now proposes a return to the earlier rules. The new regulations are urgently needed to protect our land, air and water from pollution for at least three reasons:

 

FROM 'The Planet' May 2001 http://www.sierraclub.org/planet/
MARCH - A Month of Madness

President Bush has revealed his willingness to risk American's health and wild places for the sake of appeasing industry. Consider these actions he took in March:

March 13: Bush's abrupt flip-flop on reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants broke a campaign promise, undercut Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Whitman, damaged relations with European allies and seriously impaired progress on global warming.

March 15: Bush pushed for more oil drilling in recently designated national monuments, ignoring vast potential for energy conservation and development of clean energy sources.

March 16: Bush announced his decision to suspend rules on roadless areas in national forests, possibly signaling his intention to reverse the regulations entirely.

March 20: Bush announced his decision not to tighten standards on arsenic in drinking water, thereby exposing 12.7 million Americans to additional risks for cancer and other diseases. The EPA said further public comment is needed, despite the past 25 years of study, public comment and missed statutory deadlines.

March 21: President Bush's Interior Department announced its intention to reverse requirements that mining operations post a bond equal to estimated cleanup costs. That means more mining companies will be allowed to go bankrupt, leaving taxpayers to clean up their messes.

March 27: Bush's EPA stated it opposes the 1997 Kyoto global-warming treaty, under which the United States would have to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other pollutants by 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. In a letter to four conservative senators, Bush said the agreement would harm the U.S. economy.

 

Back to Top
Back to Conservation Page
Back to Trail of Tears Home Page